Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Greater Flamingo or Caiman Flamingo in Haiti

Status of the Greater Flamingo in Haiti Jose A. Ottenwalder, Charles A. Woods, Galen B. Rathburn, John B. ThorbjarnarsonColonial Waterbirds, Vol. 13, No. 2 (1990), pp. 115-123doi:10.2307/1521577This article consists of 9 page(s).
Abstract
Although flamingos in Haiti can still be found in most areas of their historical range, survey results indicate that numbers have declined drastically over the last 50 years. The coastal mangrove lagoons between Grand Saline and Gonaives, the inland lakes of Etang Saumatre and Trou Caiman, and Ile de la Gonave have been, and remained, the major areas used by flamingos. The species has been extripated from areas with high human population densities (Ile a Vache, Les Cayes, and Cap-Haitien). No evidence of breeding activity was obtained. The last nesting colony known to occur in Haiti was reported in 1928. Available data suggest that Haiti is mostly utilized by flamingos for feeding and roosting during non-breeding, winter dispersal from Great Inagua, and perhaps Cuba. Flamingo numbers in Haiti are estimated at about 900 (+-600) birds. Population trends in Haiti are likely declining due to increasing human disturbance, habitat degradation, and exploitation for food and trade.

(N.B.: The Caiman Flamingo has its distinctive looks from other flamingos. To see a picture of the Haitian "Caiman" Flamingo, please visit the following website: (myhaiti0.tripod.com/animals.htm)

Mammal Extinctions

Print PDF of Section or Chapter
It's Too Late
Mammal Extinctions
Cuba, Puerto Rico, Hispaniola and Jamaica had a variety of unusual native rodents and shrew-like insectivores prior to the arrival of European explorers and settlers in the 1600s; many were ancient species. When native Caribbean populations settled the islands after the Ice Ages, rodents as big as marmots inhabited the larger islands. A type of giant sloth lived in Puerto Rico, and a rodent nearly the size of the American black bear inhabited the small islands of Anguilla and St. Martin until it was apparently hunted to extinction by natives (Olson 1978). Cuba, Puerto Rico and Hispaniola were once attached to the mainland of Central America, but this large land mass became separated and drifted off into the Caribbean. Some of the native fauna and flora present more than a million years ago survived until a few thousand years ago, and tiny frogs and butterflies from that period persist today.
When Europeans colonized the Caribbean islands, they began cutting forests and replacing them with huge plantations of sugar cane, other crops and grazing land for livestock. They imported thousands of slaves to farm the land. Mongooses were brought on the islands to control snakes, but they preyed on native mammals and birds instead; rats arrived in ship holds and did the same. Fifteen mammals have become extinct on Hispaniola, the island divided between present day Haiti and the Dominican Republic – this island suffered the highest number of mammal extinctions of any Caribbean island. Forests have been nearly obliterated on Haiti, which is another cause of extinctions. Cuba, Puerto Rico and Jamaica have likewise lost the majority of their forest cover, as well as many native mammals, including bats, rodents and insectivores. Jamaica was home to a monkey (Xenothrix mcgregori), making it the only Caribbean island with a native primate. It was hunted and its forest habitat was cut by European colonists, and it died out in the 1750s. Various species of hutias, large rodents found on most major islands, became extinct as well. Hutias remain on a few Caribbean islands but are close to extinction from forest destruction and predation by introduced mammals.
Most of the 40 mammals that became extinct on Caribbean islands after 1600 were rodents and insectivores. A muskrat and a rice rat became extinct on Martinique when Mt. Pelee erupted in 1902 – one of the few examples of a naturally caused modern extinction. Hutias, large rodents that resemble South American agoutis, proliferated into a variety of species on the large islands of the Greater Antilles. Settlement, deforestation and hunting caused at least five species of hutias to become extinct, and the few remaining species are now highly endangered.
The first mammal to disappear after 1600 was a massive wild cow called an auroch (Bos primagenius). This species, native to most of Europe, lived in the deciduous forests that once covered most of the continent. The auroch was also hunted for its meat and died out about 1627. Several other wild cattle related to the auroch survive in Southeast Asia, but they are critically endangered. The tarpan (Equus gmelini), a wild horse of Europe, gradually became rare and restricted from hunting and destruction of its native forests during the Middle Ages. The last wild tarpans were killed off in 1851 (Day 1981). Both the auroch and the tarpan are depicted by Pleistocene humans in magnificent cave paintings found in southern Spain and France.
The Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis stelleri) was an enormous 24 to 30 feet long marine mammal, similar in appearance to the dugong and the manatee. The sea cow was larger, however, and swam in the cold arctic waters of the Bering Sea, enduring temperatures that would kill its closest relatives. The slow and sluggish sea cows were killed off only 27 years after their discovery. They were first seen by the shipwrecked crew of the explorer Vitus Bering in 1741 in the vicinity of Bering Island in the Commander Islands, off the eastern coast of Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula. These sea cows were tame and easy to spear and harpoon by the ship crews who killed most of the population, calculated at only about 1,500. This animal showed extreme protectiveness toward its fellows and strong bonds between mates. The naturalist Georg Wilhelm Steller, after whom the species was named, described their behavior on being harpooned.
. . . Some of them tried to upset the boat [when another sea cow was struck] with their backs, while others pressed down the rope and endeavored to break it, or strove to remove the hook from the wound in the back by blows of their tail, in which they actually succeeded several times. It is most remarkable proof of their conjugal affection that the male, after having tried with all his might, although in vain, to free the female caught by the hook, and in spite of the beating we gave him, nevertheless followed her to the shore, and that several times, even after she was dead, he shot unexpectedly up to her like a speeding arrow. Early next morning, when we came to cut up the meat and bring it to the dugout we found the male by the female, and the same I observed on the third day when I went there by myself for the sole purpose of examining the intestine (Day 1981).
Australia has been the scene of more mammal extinctions than any other continent or island group. Beginning in the 19th century, Australia's mammals disappeared in large numbers. Native marsupials and rodents were gradually eliminated by massive habitat destruction and predation from animals introduced by European settlers. Twenty-two mammals became extinct after 1600. A wide variety of marsupials, from small species to wallabies, was extinguished within a century of settlement. Some, like the thylacine, or Tasmanian wolf (Thylacinus cyanocephalus), were deliberately persecuted by livestock ranchers under the misapprehension that the species presented a threat to flocks.
The crescent nailtail wallaby (Onychogalea lunata) was native to the gum forests of western Australia where John Gilbert, a 19th century museum collector, found the animal common in thick scrub, "where it is occasionally seen sunning itself" (Strahan 1995). This small marsupial weighed less than 20 pounds and looked like a miniature kangaroo. It rested in hollows in soft ground beneath shrubs during the day, feeding mainly at night on roots and coarse grass (Nowak 1999). When chased, it would run to a hollow tree with a hole in the bottom and clamber up the sides until it got high up within the trunk; aborigines used smoke to chase them out and then killed them for food (Strahan 1995). The aborigines also hunted these animals by building brush fences and enclosures and driving the animals into areas where people waited with clubs (Strahan 1995). In spite of hunting, this wallaby was fairly common until 1900, and many were collected for museums (Strahan 1995). It disappeared from the southern portion of its range early in the century after intensive forest clearance and development of the country for agriculture. Gradually, it became very rare, and disappeared altogether from the wild in the 1960s (Nowak 1999, Strahan 1995). Some experts suggested the removal of the thickets where these wallabies sheltered during the heat of the day left them homeless and vulnerable to predation (Nowak 1999).
Millions of acres of eucalyptus forests and mulga woodlands of southern and western Australia were clearcut by settlers beginning in the 19th century, opening up the land to wildfires (Lines 1991). The devastation of these habitats was described in Taming the Great South Land. A History of the Conquest of Nature in Australia, by W.J. Lines (1991). The combination of this habitat destruction, hunting and introduced predators, such as feral dogs, was responsible for the extinction of the Crescent Nailtail wallaby and many other native marsupials.
Various endemic Australian rodents and bats died out as well, and many of the remaining native mammals are become confined to tiny islands off the coasts – the only habitats where introduced animals are absent. Australia is like an island in having been isolated from other land masses for millions of years, and the majority of its mammals are endemic to the continent. In fact, it is often referred to as the "Island Continent." If Australian extinctions are included among those on islands, 87 percent of all extinctions of vertebrates other than fish have occurred on islands.
In Asia, the freshwater baiji dolphin species was until recently found throughout the Yangtze River and its surrounding lakes and tributaries. Unfortunately, the exponential growth of the Chinese population posed a variety of threats to its survival. A lack of information, growing threats and the species' small population size eventually led to the baiji's decline, despite protective efforts. Baiji dolphins were last officially sighted in 2004, and a 2006 expedition deemed the species "functionally extinct."






©1983 Animal Welfare Institute

http://www.endangeredspecieshandbook.org/dinos_mammal.php

Endangered Species

Animal Info - Haitian Solenodon
(Other Name: Hispaniolan Solenodon, Solenodonte)
Solenodon paradoxus
Status: Endangered
Contents
1. Profile (Picture)2. Tidbits3. Status and Trends (IUCN Status, Countries Where Currently Found, Population Estimates, History of Distribution, Threats and Reasons for Decline)4. Data on Biology and Ecology (Weight, Habitat, Birth Rate, Early Development, Dispersal, Diet, Behavior, Social Organization)5. References
Profile
Picture: Haitian Solenodon (76 Kb JPEG)
The Haitian solenodon is an insectivore weighing about 1 kg (2.2 lb). Solenodons inhabit forests and brushy or rocky areas, often around plantations. Insects and spiders found in soil and leaf litter form most of its diet. The Haitian solenodon is mainly nocturnal, hiding during the day in rock clefts, hollow trees, or burrows which it excavates itself. Solenodons obtain food by rooting in the ground with their snouts and by tearing into rotten logs and trees with their foreclaws. The 1 or 2 young in a litter are born in a nesting burrow.The Haitian solenodon has apparently endemic to Hispaniola. It was thought to be extinct, or almost so, until 1907, when it was found living in the interior of the island. It was not considered to be in immediate danger early in this century. In 1966 it was known to occur in several localities of rocky, bushy and forested areas in the Dominican Republic. As of 1981, after extensive searching, it was concluded that the solenodon was 'functionally extinct' in Haiti, persisting only in the remote mountains of the south. In 1987 it still occurred in both countries but was thought to be particularly threatened in Haiti. It still occurred in both countries as of 1996.The most significant threats to the Haitian solenodon appear to be the continuing loss of its forest habitat and predation by introduced cats and dogs, especially by dogs in the vicinity of settlements.
Tidbits
*** As in most nocturnal terrestrial insectivores, the Haitian solenodon's sense of touch is highly developed, while smell and hearing are also important.
*** The Cuban and Haitian solenodons secrete poison from a gland above their teeth to subdue prey.
*** Solenodons have a long life span and low reproductive rate, as a result of having been among the dominant predators before Europeans colonized the New World.
Status and Trends
IUCN Status:
1960's - 1994: Endangered
1996 - 2004: Endangered; (Criteria: A1cde) (Population Trend: Decreasing) (IUCN 2004)
Countries Where the Haitian Solenodon Is Currently Found:
2004: Occurs in the Dominican Republic and Haiti (IUCN 2004).
Population Estimates:
[Note: Figures given are for wild populations only.]
Haiti
1977: Probably fewer than 100 (Oryx 1977c)
History of Distribution:
The Haitian solenodon has apparently only existed on Hispaniola. It was thought to be extinct, or almost so, until 1907, when it was found living in the interior of the island. It was not considered to be in immediate danger early in this century. In 1966 it was known to occur in several localities of rocky, bushy and forested areas in the Dominican Republic. As of 1981, after extensive searching, it was concluded that the solenodon was 'functionally extinct' in Haiti, persisting only in the remote mountains of the south, especially the area surrounding the Massif de la Hotte in the extreme southwest. It was thought to be common in certain areas of the Dominican Republic. In 1987 it still occurred in both countries but was thought to be particularly threatened in Haiti.
Distribution Map (10 Kb) (InfoNatura)
Threats and Reasons for Decline:
The most significant threats to the Haitian solenodon appear to be the continuing loss of its forest habitat and predation by introduced cats and dogs, especially by dogs in the vicinity of settlements.
Data on Biology and Ecology
Weight:
The Haitian solenodon weighs 700 - 1000 g (25 - 35 oz).
Habitat:
The Haitian solenodon is found in forests and brush country, as well as around plantations.
The Haitian solenodon is one of the species that live in both the Caribbean Biodiversity Hotspot (Cons. Intl.) and the Greater Antillean Moist Forests Global 200 Ecoregion. (Olson & Dinerstein 1998, Olson & Dinerstein 1999)
Birth Rate:
1 or 2 young per litter.
Early Development:
The young are born in a nesting burrow.
Dispersal:
Young solenodons remain with their mother for several months, which is exceptionally long for insectivores.
Diet:
Insects and spiders found in soil and leaf litter form most of its diet.
Behavior:
The Haitian solenodon is mainly nocturnal, hiding during the day in rock clefts, hollow trees, or burrows which it excavates itself. Solenodons obtain food by rooting in the ground with their snouts and by tearing into rotten logs and trees with their foreclaws.
Social Organization:
Adults are solitary, other than mothers with young.
References
Burton & Pearson 1987, Cons. Intl., Curry-Lindahl 1972, InfoNatura, IUCN 1969, IUCN 1994, IUCN 1996, IUCN 2000, IUCN 2003a, IUCN 2004, Macdonald 1984, Nowak & Paradiso 1983, Olson & Dinerstein 1998, Olson & Dinerstein 1999, Oryx 1977c, Woods 1981
Top of Page Search This Site
Home Rarest Mammals Species Index Species Groups Index Country Index Links
By: Paul Massicot; Last modified: November 2, 2005; © 1999 - 2005 Animal Info

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

carbon cycle




Carbon cycle

Carbon dioxide is used by plants for photosynthesis. The carbon is then built up into carbon compounds in the plants.
These carbon compounds either:
a) decay into peat, then over millions of years, coal (under very high pressures and worked on by microbes in the absence of oxygen). The coal is then burned by factories to produce electricity, and thus the carbon is returned to carbon dioxide in the air; or


b) are eaten by animals (or remain in the plant, no difference). The carbon compounds in both the plants and animals are returned to the air as carbon dioxide via respiration and also when they die and decay, as microbes digest their biomass.
Thus the cycle is complete.

Nitrogen in the air is built up into nitrates by nitrogen fixing bacteria. These nitrates are then absorbed by plants and turned into plant proteins. Leguminous plants can simply take the nitrogen in the air, and then build it up into plant proteins. The plant protein is then eaten by animals, who then excrete the protein as ammonia. Both the plant and animals proteins can be broken down and digested by microbes once the plant or animal dies into ammonia.
This ammonia is then oxidized by nitrifying bacteria into nitrites, which are then oxidized again by other nitrifying bacteria into nitrates.
Denitrifying bacteria can reduce nitrates to nitrogen in the air, nitrites or ammonia.


Carbon Cycle

The movement of carbon, in its many forms, between the biosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and geosphere is described by the carbon cycle, illustrated in the adjacent diagram. The carbon cycle is one of the biogeochemical cycles. In the cycle there are various sinks, or stores, of carbon (represented by the boxes) and processes by which the various sinks exchange carbon (the arrows). We are all familiar with how the atmosphere and vegetation exchange carbon. Plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere during photosynthesis, also called primary production, and release CO2 back in to the atmosphere during respiration. Another major exchange of CO2 occurs between the oceans and the atmosphere. The dissolved CO2 in the oceans is used by marine biota in photosynthesis.
Two other important processes are fossil fuel burning and changing land use. In fossil fuel burning, coal, oil, natural gas, and gasoline are consumed by industry, power plants, and automobiles. Notice that the arrow goes only one way: from industry to the atmosphere. Changing land use is a broad term which encompasses a host of essentially human activities. They include agriculture, deforestation, and reforestation.
The adjacent diagram shows the carbon cycle with the mass of carbon, in gigatons of carbon (Gt C), in each sink and for each process, if known. The amount of carbon being exchanged in each process determines whether the specific sink is growing or shrinking. For instance, the ocean absorbs 2.5 Gt C more from the atmosphere than it gives off to the atmosphere. All other things being equal, the ocean sink is growing at a rate of 2.5 Gt C per year and the atmospheric sink is decreasing at an equal rate. But other things are not equal. Fossil fuel burning is increasing the atmosphere's store of carbon by 6.1 Gt C each year, and the atmosphere is also interacting with vegetation and soil. Furthermore, there is changing land use.
The carbon cycle is obviously very complex, and each process has an impact on the other processes. If primary production drops, then decay to the soil drops. But does this mean that decay from the soil to the atmosphere will also drop and thus balance out the cycle so that the store of carbon in the atmosphere will remain constant? Not necessarily; it could continue at its current rate for a number of years, and thus the atmosphere would have to absorb the excess carbon being released from the soil. But this increase of atmospheric carbon (in the form of CO2) may stimulate the ocean to increase its uptake of CO2 .
What is known is that the carbon cycle must be a closed system; in other words, there is a fixed amount of carbon in the world and it must be somewhere. Scientists are actively investigating the carbon cycle to see if their data does indeed indicate a balancing of the cycle. These types of investigations have led many scientists to believe that the forests of the Northern Hemisphere are, in fact, absorbing 3.5 Gt C per year, and so changing land use is actually removing carbon from the atmosphere (~2 Gt C/year), not increasing it as the diagram shows. Experiments are ongoing to confirm this information.
Balancing the Carbon Cycle
Using the data given in the carbon cycle diagram, attempt to balance the carbon cycle. By balance, we mean--given the amount of carbon moving between the various sinks, as listed on the process arrows--what must be the rate at which the various sinks are changing. Are they increasing, decreasing, or remaining constant? Be sure to include the uncertainties in your calculations. Remember, the carbon cycle is a closed system, so all the carbon must be accounted for. It cannot disappear.
If scientists can figure out where the carbon from anthropogenic sources is going, then it may be possible to devise programs to enhance the uptake of carbon in these sinks. This would reduce the rate of increase of carbon in the atmosphere and perhaps slow global warming. Hints: When scientists balance the carbon cycle, they consider only those processes and sinks which interact directly with the atmosphere, since increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere may cause global warming.
For decay from soil to atmosphere, use 60 GtC. This number is hotly contested, however, with many scientists believing that the soil is a significant sink for atmospheric carbon (2-3 GtC/year). Research is ongoing in this area.Consider whether sinks are growing or shrinking. For instance, from the Mauna Loa CO2 data (You will need Excel 5.0 or higher.) or the text version we can calculate the increase in carbon in the atmosphere with a high degree of certainty. What about the other sinks? What evidence do we have that they may be growing or shrinking?




Biogeochemical Cycles

While humans cannot control the weather on a daily basis, the influence of human life on the environment plays a significant role in global climate.
How often have you wished for a rainy day to go away, or for the warm weather of summer during wintertime? Unfortunately, these wishes rarely come true, and it seems as though humans have little control over the weather. While humans cannot control the weather on a daily basis, the influence of human life on the environment plays a significant role in global climate. Deforestation and fossil fuel burning are just a couple of examples of human activities that seriously disrupt the equilibrium of the global ecosystem and alter the biogeochemical cycles that play a role in determining the Earth’s climate.


Biogeochemical cycles are essentially the continuous transport and transformation of materials in the environment. Materials are transported through life, air, sea and land in a series of cycles. These cycles include the circulation of elements and nutrients upon which life and the earth’s climate depend. The most important biogeochemical cycles are those of water, carbon, nitrogen and certain other trace gases. In this text, however, we will discuss the carbon and nitrogen cycles, as they are closely intertwined with living things on Earth.
The carbon cycle is particularly influential when it comes to global climate. Much of the carbon in the carbon cycle is in the form of carbon dioxide, a gas that has a strong greenhouse effect because it absorbs infrared radiation. Carbon is one of the most common elements on Earth and it is the basis of all living things. Below is a graphical depiction of the carbon cycle: Nitrogen is another element that plays important roles in both biological and non-biological systems. Nitrogen gas makes up 80% of the Earth’s atmosphere and nitrogen exists in proteins of living organisms. The nitrogen cycle is depicted below:
Global climate change, temperature, precipitation and the stability of ecosystems are all dependent upon biogeochemical cycles. When humans inadvertently disrupt these cycles by, for example, polluting, disastrous consequences can result. A healthy understanding of these cycles are critical in order to ensure the health and safety of future generations of living things on Earth. From climate changes to atmospheric composition, biogeochemical cycles are an integral component of planetary biology.

Biography
http://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/carbon/efremote4.html
http://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/carbon/efcarbon.html
http://wzus.ask.com/r?t=a&d=us&s=a&c=p&ti=1&ai=30752&l=dir&o=0&sv=0a30051e&ip=18e9a87a&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.powledge-words.net%2FAbtBdx%2FAssets%2FImages%2Fcarbon_cycle_diagram.gifhttp://library.thinkquest.org/C003763/index.php?page=planet03

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Environmental Organizations


I have decided to join an environmental organization in order to participate more actively in solving the environmental problems that threaten our world. So, I have taken a close look at the mission statements of three major environmental organizations: Greenpeace, Wild Spots Foundation and Natural Resources Defense Council in order to make a decision that would be logical and personally compatible as well.


Greenpeace was created in 1971 to protest U.S. nuclear testing off the coast of Alaska. Since then, this organization has been addressing global environmental threats through "peaceful direct action". In fact, this means that their activists are very determined people who take extreme personal actions as they put themselves in harm's way in order to bring worldwide attention to specific issues and solve them. This is the most engaging type of activism to which, unfortunately, only a few special people can dedicate themselves. Our modern lifestyle has put our planet at a dangerously high level of environmental risk, and our world needs a greater number of that kind of people to come to its rescue.

Wild Spots Foundation is an organization that dedicates itself solely to saving "habitats of endangered species". Its activities concentrate on specific problems related to the conservation of natural resources and wildlife preservation throughout the world. This is a very noble objective because mankind, while promoting its own development and satisfaction, is destroying the habitat of other species in all corners of the planet. Nature's support system belongs to all the species that inhabit the earth, and man is just one among its species. Other species should not suffer from man's insatiable expansion.

For its part, the Natural Resources Defense Council claims that its purpose is to "safeguard the Earth: its people, its plants and animals and the natural systems on which all life depends." This is the broadest manner to pose the environmental issues that our society faces today. The Earth is one and belongs to all the forms of life that it sustains all together. NRDC's approach is ethical, and ethics is the missing link that can save the planet from the global threats that might soon put all its inhabitants, man included, on the list of endangered species.

Of these three environmental organizations, I would like to join the Natural Resources Defense Council because its battle ground is at the ethical level, and NRDC addresses the environmental problems at the level of the legal system. That is where the wrong decisions that are being taken can be fought, and that is where they can be undone.

Actually, I do not believe that I have what it takes to fully participate in the actions taken by the members of Greenpeace. I greatly admire them, but frankly I cannot even imagine a close friend putting his or her well-being in jeopardy like they do. Greenpeace activism calls on an exceptional individual. On the other hand, I find Wild Spots Foundation's goal too narrow even though I agree that it is crucial to protect animal life, specially the endangered species as they have as much right to this planet as every other living being.

As a supporter of the Natural Resources Defense Council, I will be kept aware of all the major issues affecting our environment such as the six following goals that NRDC lists as its priorities: curb global warming, save endangered wild places, move America beyond oil, revive the world's oceans, stem the tide of toxic chemicals, and accelerate the greening of China. Also, my financial contribution will go toward enabling this institution and its lawyers to tackle the institutional systems that have the responsibility to correct these global problems. I believe NRDC's approach to be more pragmatic; it seems more likely to succeed in eventually creating "a new way of life for humankind, one that can be sustained indefinitely without fouling or depleting the resources that support all life on Earth."